Abby Martin covers new files obtained by Al Jazeera and the Guardian which show that while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was claiming at the UN General Assembly that Iran was close to a nuclear bomb, his own intelligence services were doubting the claims. Newly-discovered disclosures that show the Clinton Foundation has seen a surge in foreign and corporate investment in anticipation of her 2016 Presidential Campaign. Lawyer Mike Papantonio talks about a case involving Bayer Corporation infecting unsuspecting hemophiliacs with AIDS. Senator John McCain called out for a recent tweet he posted to Breaking the Set’s takedown of his war criminality. Finally, an interview with CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou.
Archive for the ‘politics’ Category
Posted in politics, tagged AL JAZEERA, Bayer, Benjamin Netanyahu, Clinton, Clinton Foundation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, nuclear bomb, Senator John McCain, UN General Assembly on February 25, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Posted in economics, government, history, media, politics, tagged conspiracy theories, Conspiracy theorist, Conspiracy Theorists, Declaration of Independence, free market capitalism on February 24, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Conspiracy Theorists USED TO Be Accepted As Normal
Democracy and free market capitalism were founded on conspiracy theories.
The Magna Carta, the Constitution and Declaration of Independence and other founding Western documents were based on conspiracy theories. Greek democracy and free market capitalism were also based on conspiracy theories.
But those were the bad old days …Things have now changed.
The CIA Coined the Term Conspiracy Theorist In 1967
That all changed in the 1960s.
Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.
The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.
The dispatch states: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/con.html
February 20, 2015 5:00 am
The Wall Street Journal reported this past week that the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation has quietly dropped its ban on foreign contributions and is accepting donations from the governments of “the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany, and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline.” The Journal’s conclusion: Since 2001 “the foundation has raised at least $48 million from overseas governments.”
Needless to say, the gargantuan troll-like conflict of interest that arises as soon as the foundation of the leading candidate for the presidency of the United States begins accepting money from overseas is apparent to every sentient being on the planet except members of the Clinton family and the growing number of advisers, consultants, strategists, pollsters, groupies, allies, and hangers-on whose livelihood depends on that family’s political success. “These contributions,” the foundation said in a statement to the Journal, “are helping improve the lives of millions of people across the world, for which we are grateful.”
What I love about this statement is its flip shamelessness, the way in which its airy sentimental public relations gobbledygook is both a denial of what is obviously a corrupt practice and an implicit endorsement of it. I do not doubt for a moment that the Clinton flack who led the email chain that came up with this blistering retort to the Journal is indeed “grateful” for every single one of the donations that foreign governments are making to his organization, because life in Manhattan and North Caldwell, New Jersey, is very expensive and these kids are not going to be paying for college on their own you know. If a little charity on the part of his excellency Sultan Qaboos of Oman can help pay for the lake house in Connecticut and the monthly installment on that brand new Tesla you’ve been eyeing through the window of the store on 25th Street, well, what’s the harm? The programs you run—“transforming communities,” “creating partnerships of purpose,” devising other alliterative slogans—“improve the lives of millions of people across the world.” OK, maybe not “millions of people,” but certainly the lives of the oligarchs and monarchs and functionaries and foreign agents who sign checks to the Clintons and can count on reciprocity, not to mention the lives of one very special pair of grandparents, their beloved daughter, her husband (especially when Goldman Sachs is footing the bill for losses at his hedge fund), and beautiful Charlotte.
In its 14 years of existence the Clinton Foundation has raised a sum approaching $2 billion. A McClatchy analysis found that 40 percent of contributions in the last decade have come from foreign sources. “It’s a massive sum of money—though no one has done a story yet on how overseas programs they fund have worked,” Maggie Haberman of the New York Times noted on Twitter. Gee I wonder why. It’s almost as though the political press is morally and intellectually disarmed whenever it hears words like “global dialogue” and “wellness” and “economic development” and “women and girls,” as if the gritty, cynical, I’ve-seen-it-all correspondents for our major newspapers and networks turn to bubbling bittersweet goo as soon as some Clinton flack tells them, “We are working with global partners to build an evidence-based case for the full participation of women and girls in the 21st century,” and their eyes fall on a picture of a cute, vibrant, and diverse group of young women surrounding the aging potentate and her daughter and former NBC News special correspondent. What it would take the Post or the Times to dispatch a reporter to Ishmaelia or wherever to examine, in skeptical detail, just where the Clinton money is going, to report on the precise state of the President Peter Mutharika Water Reclamation Plant and Convention Center, is beyond me. Certainly the reports from Haiti are not encouraging. Even the Journal is not clear when the Clinton Foundation dropped its ban on foreign money, a mystery the Foundation itself does not seem to be in any hurry to solve.
One can always count on the media’s herd instinct, however, and in the hours since the initial Journal scoop and the Clintons’ flagrant doubling-down on buckraking from overseas interests, a group of stories has appeared that suggests the Clintons have a big problem on their hands. A Washington Post analysis “found substantial overlap between the Clinton political machinery and the foundation,” and noted that “nearly half of the major donors who are backing ready for Hillary, a group promoting her 2016 presidential bid, as well as nearly half of the bundlers from her 2008 campaign, have given at least $10,000 to the foundation, either on their own or through foundations or companies they run.” What do you think they want for all of that money? An Eid al-Fatr card?
McClatchy draws our attention to donors such as “Mohammed Al-Amoudi, a billionaire businessman who lives in Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia, retired German race car driver Michael Schumacher, and Denis O’Brien, the Irish chairman of Digicel phone company,” who “each donated between $5 million to $10 million.” You know, regular folks; American-Gothic types; the sort of common people who so puzzle Clinton that she is asking more than 200 policy wonks for advice on how to talk to them.
How I would love to have been in the room with Bill Clinton and Doug Band and God-only-knows-who-else as the former president sweet-talked Herr Schumacher, telling him stories of his childhood and presidency and subsequent career, confiding his preferred cigar brands, mixing up funny vignettes with economic and political analysis, dropping hints at Hillary’s political future and impending ascension to the status of Sun-Queen, dispensing tips on vegan dieting, interspersing his unending monologue with deadpan treacle like “it’s for our children” and “we’re all one big global village” and “you should see what they’re doing for women’s health in Rwanda,” as the “retired German race car driver” kept his mouth contorted in a tight grin, ready to mention the quo for the quid, feeling like a big man for gaining proximity to the biggest big man of them all.
And to think that scenes like this have played out in conference rooms and private jets and luxury hotels around the world for over a decade, with promises exchanged and pledges made and deals negotiated and influence peddled, and no one really has the faintest idea of any of the details except members of Bill Clinton’s innermost circle. What beguiles and amazes is the scope of the self-dealing, the effrontery of the horse-trading, the utterly earnest way in which the Clintons are able to transform hobnobbing with and skimming off the global elite into a parody of “philanthropy.”
I also find it revealing, though, that the Clintons seemed to be caught off guard by the Wall Street Journal’s reporting, that the insistence by Clinton Foundation spokesmen that there is no story here and that it is “a false choice” to suggest a conflict of interest when foreign billionaires hand money to the presidential frontrunner has assumed an increasingly desperate character. What the scrambling exposes is that this political organization is as aloof and tone-deaf as ever.
Clinton appears to have decided to remain secluded for as long as possible so that her approval numbers do not plunge, but I wonder whether this strategy is as sound as she seems to think it is. It’s not as though her non-candidacy candidacy is really producing results. Her book was a flop, she stepped in it with the “dead broke” comments, continuing the paid speeches and chartered flights plays into the caricature of a tired comfortable rich politician, all of the infighting is being played out in the media, some liberals are wondering whether it really would be a good thing for her to become the first non-incumbent in memory to waltz into the nomination unopposed, and now she faces the prospect of two years of questions about transactions and commitments and actions by her husband and his cronies.
What the Clintons have done in the years after they left the White House will be an important part of the “narrative” of the 2016 campaign, of the tale Republicans market to the public of a venal and corrupt and bizarre family so bent on wealth and power that they are more interested in catering to rich foreigners than to the average American. I don’t know if the public will buy it—no one knows—but I do know that Hillary Clinton as a candidate and as the chief executive of a massive political organization has shown herself to be seriously deficient in the methods and skills required for a successful presidential campaign. She lost before, she’s flubbing now, and people are beginning to recognize that she can always lose again. It’s not the sleaze so much as her clumsy pronounced absence of style, her hesitant maladroit uneasy responses to tough questions posed by serious critics. It won’t be corruption alone that does Hillary in. It will be her cluelessness.
‘Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been left red-faced after a video shot by a celebrity home designer depicting his modest lifestyle was revealed to be recorded in his servants’ quarters.
The 15-minute film by Moshik Galamin showed Mr Netanyahu’s wife Sara guiding the viewer around the couple’s home, where run down parts of the property such as creaking doors and frayed carpets, are detailed.
But it has now emerged Galamin was not granted access to the couple’s upstairs living quarters, and Israel’s Channel 10 TV claimed the kitchen in question was not even the one the Netanyahus use, but rather a secondary administrative kitchen.’
Posted in economics, foreign policy, government, military, politics, tagged Barack Obama, Bricks, BRICS, George Bush, George W Bush, President Kennedy, Pricks, Syria on February 15, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Survival is our greatest instinct. Men might conform their opinions to those of their associates and their superiors but they will not knowingly die to protect those who robbed them blind, killed their leaders and sent them to die in idiotic wars.
And that is the problem the leaders of the Pricks nations – otherwise known as NATO- face as they approach the Endgame of their war against the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.) Clarification: NATO actually stands for Not Altogether Thought Out. Its membership includes nations already looking for the exits. Greece is talking to Russia. Turkey has agreed to build a Russian natural gas pipeline across their country to a terminal in Greece. Germany and France held talks directly with the Russians to solve the Ukraine crisis in defiance of the American Teleprompter Reader Barack Obama. When Tony Blair was Prime Minister, he discussed George W Bush with his Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. They concluded that Bush was not the real President of the United States. The same can be said of Barack Obama.
The key to surviving the Pricks Vs BRICS Wars for those of us in NATO nations is to make sure everyone knows that none of the people they vote for actually have anything to do with running their countries. The United States handed over its Sovereignty to the owners of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank back during the Woodrow Wilson administration. The Sovereign issues your currency. In America the Sovereign is the Federal Reserve Bank. It charges us interest for the privilege of using the money they created out of nothing. The first meeting held by agents of the Rothschilds to write the Federal Reserve Act was held on November 22, 1910 in a private rail car across the river from Manhattan. That rail car was to take those men to Jekyll Island.
Exactly 53 years later on November 22, 1963, the Bankers together with Israel killed President Kennedy because he dared to assert Sovereignty for America.
The end of American Sovereignty ushered in many wars none of which were in the interests of the United States. Martin Luther King Jr was opposed to the Vietnam War and gave a speech against it on April 4, 1967 at the Riverside Church in New York City. He had planned to go to Washington to stop the Vietnam War even if it took all summer. He was killed on April 4, 1968 under extremely suspicious circumstances. The federal government called up the Memphis police and fire departments and told them to send all black police officers and firemen in the area near Dr King home for the day.
At that time, J Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI and Lyndon Baines Johnson was the President. The latter was partially of Jewish descent. One of the reasons Johnson was made President was that Wall Street wanted the United States to go into the Vietnam War and to lose it. They wanted white Americans to become addicted to drugs. The Bankers launder a trillion dollars a year in illegal drugs and weapons. The other major consideration was that President Kennedy had demanded to inspect the Israeli nuclear works at Dimona. Prime Minister David Ben Gurion decided that Kennedy had to go.
The Pricks alliance (NATO) has been trying to get World War III started for several years. General Wesley Clark was told shortly after 911 that the US military was to invade 7 countries in 5 years. George Bush’s administration had told its allies that it was going to invade Afghanistan even before 911. Israel did 911 because they wanted Americans to be persuaded by the Jewish dominated media to sacrifice the lives of young Gentiles and spend trillions of dollars to kill those in the Mideast who would object to the genocide of the Palestinian people.
That list of 7 nations included Libya and Syria. Hillary Clinton is famous for saying, ‘We came, We saw, He died’ about the death of Qaddafi. Obama followed orders dictated by Richard Perle in his position paper A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing the Realm which he wrote in 1996 for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It called for the raising of proxy armies to attack Syria over the issue of chemical weapons. A Clean Break had also called for the invasion of Iraq for the purposes of regime change. George Bush did that for Israel in 2003.
The Cheney-Bush administration tried to twice get World War III going. One was a plan to have Navy Seals disguised as Iranians attack a US ship in the Persian Gulf. The other was by the Georgian military who at the urging of the US and Israel attacked South Ossetia using artillery, tanks and rockets. They killed over 1,500 civilians in their initial August 8, 2008 assault. The Jewish controlled media reported this as an attack on Georgia by Russia. The President of Georgia had been installed by the George Soros led ‘Rose’ coup. He carved up Georgian for foreign interests and turned the country into a police state with the help of US and Israeli advisers. He was what we would call a Prick. He was willing to believe that he could attack Russia and survive.
Obama’s administration is run by a few men and three women: Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice and Samantha Power. Jarret has the oldest and closest ties to Chicago where blacks and Irish run the city for the benefit of the Jews.
The Obama admin has been at war with BRICS for some time now. For the past several years the US has been funding proxy armies to kill Syrians. To date Obama’s terrorists killed 300,000 Syrians including 100,000 Christians. The Jewish owned press says this was the fault of President Assad who attacked his own people with chemical weapons. The UN says otherwise. Obama might be at odds with Netanyahu but he is doing the will of Israel by funding Al Qaeda and ISIS. Israel has been attacking Syrian positions as if they were Al Qaeda’s Air Force. America has been attacking Syrian infrastructure and dropping supplies into ISIS in Iraq.
The ground war is going badly in the Ukraine. The people have no incentive to kill Russian speaking civilians. The rebels have surrounded two Ukrainian armies and the people back home are resisting the draft.
The Obama administration at the urging of his military and his political advisers have refused to attack Iran. Iran has joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organization which makes them allies of Russia, China, India and Pakistan amongst others. As I have said before, Iran is manufacturing mach 3 missiles with advanced guidance systems and 600 to 650 kilogram warheads. They have thousands of small fast boats being armed with 200 kilometer range missiles. They have rocket artillery with 130 mile range and 1,300 pound warheads. And they are making start of the art drones which can fire missiles. The US military is not willing to directly confront Iran because they know their Persian Gulf fleet would be sunk and they would lose every military base within 2,000 kilometers of Iran.
The Pricks led coalition (meaning the US and Great Britain) are left with one option which is to simultaneously attack Syria and ISIS.
Two years ago the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Martin Dempsey, had to go to the White House at midnight to tell Obama that the military would rather mutiny than be Al Qaeda’s Air Force and Navy in his proposed attack on Syria that had been imminent.
Since then Al Qaeda of Iraq was rebranded by changing its name to ISIS. They were allowed to post videos and recruit new fighters on Facebook and Twitter. They were given a green-light to enter Iraq and seize the city of Mosul. The Pakistani police arrested a man in December of 2014. He confessed that he had been paid $600 by Americans for every young man he could recruit to fight for ISIS in Syria.
Rita Katz of the Site Group has released many videos that are supposedly from ISIS. The Mossad appears to have some operational control over ISIS. Remember when Japan decided to support Palestinian statehood? Two Japanese men were soon afterward captured and executed. That was recorded on video. Remember when France decided to recognize Palestine? The next thing to happen was a massacre at the Charlie Hebdo headquarters in Paris. The war in Syria has gone badly for ISIS so a rationale for using US troops has to be found to invade Iraq and Syria. All of a sudden ISIS attacks an Iraqi base with 300 US Marines 2 miles away. And a Jordanian pilot was burned alive. The video released by Rita Katz prodded the Jordanians into attacking ISIS with several bombing runs. The goal is to get Jordan to operate as a base for the Pricks alliance when they decide to launch a ground invasion of Syria.
The Pricks leadership trained, armed and funded ISIS. Now they want our military to go into ground combat against ISIS in Syria and Iraq. The Prime Minister of the UK is embroiled in a close election set in May and is unlikely to want anything to do with a war against Syria and ISIS. The plan would be to send in ground troops to attack the Syrian government and to turn over territory to the ‘moderate’ rebels. These would be the same ‘moderate’ who uploaded videos of them beheading Christians and committing random acts of cannibalism.
The Pricks leadership is downright silly. Iran could respond by sending a lot more troops into Iraq. Russia could respond by setting up a Naval base with Iran in Yemen. That nation borders Saudi Arabia, Oman and the Red Sea. Iran and Russia have other military options. The Pricks alliance has no options that make sense.
The people of the Pricks nations know that their leaders seek a war every time the economy goes south. Three million Americans starved to death in the Great Depression. We are in far worse shape today than then we have many more Unpayable Debts to cancel. We could easily lose 10 million Americans to starvation. The Pricks leadership would rather launch World War III than offer Debt Cancellation and a Debt Free currency like Lincoln’s Greenbacks.
The Pricks will soon realize they have no followers. No one to believe their lies and no one to follow their dictates. And more importantly no one willing to die in another of their senseless wars.
Survivors will need to do two things. Tell their friends and neighbors about this imminent economic collapse and that nasty habit of the Pricks to start wars every time the unemployment rate soars. The second thing is to prepare to live for 3 hard months with minimal outside help. It might take 90 days to get a new government up and running.
Note: The idea of a Pricks Vs BRICS conflict was not original to me.
Posted in economics, education, enviroment, government, health, history, law, media, military, politics, religion, science, tagged American capitalist system, corrupt world, education system, Genetically modified food, life, world collapse on February 11, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Exposing the truth about our corrupt world and what humanity has become.
This is a short documentary film I made and wrote questioning our freedom, the education system, corporations, money, the American capitalist system, the US government, world collapse, the environment, climate change, genetically modified food, and our treatment of animals.
Never in the history of this sad planet have so many bitched about so much. And it all amounts to nothing. It isn’t changing a damned thing. I have yet to hear “Storm the Castle”. “Lynch the bastards!”
Posted in government, politics, tagged Benjamin Netanyahu, democrats, Iran, Israel, Israeli prime minister’s speech, joint session of Congress, Netanyahu, Netanyahu speech, Pro-Israel lobby on February 10, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
‘Several pro-Israel lobby groups in the United States have threatened to “publicly condemn” Democrats who plan to skip the Israeli prime minister’s speech about Iran before Congress next month.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s well-funded Jewish conservative backers say they may use their funds to draw attention in the districts and states of any Democratic lawmaker who is not at the US Capitol to listen to Netanyahu on March 3.
Netanyahu has been invited by House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner to address a joint session of Congress to speak about the “threat” of Iran’s nuclear energy program.’
Hillary Clinton’s Stonewalling of Peace Agreement with Libya: Bombshell Tapes Confirm Citizen Commission’s Findings on Benghazi
Posted in foreign policy, government, history, media, military, politics, tagged Benghazi, Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, Muammar Qaddafi, Secretary, Secretary Clinton on February 4, 2015 | 1 Comment »
As Hillary Clinton further delays the announcement of her 2016 run for the White House, more news has broken regarding her role in the 2011 disastrous intervention in Libya, which set the stage for the 2012 Benghazi attacks where we lost four brave American lives.
Two new stories from The Washington Times expose some of the infighting among government agencies and branches of government on this controversial decision, and highlight the key role that Clinton played in initiating the war. You can listen to tapes of discussions between Pentagon staffers, former Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), and the Qaddafi regime for yourself.
This news also validates the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB) 2014 interim report, which exposed that Muammar Qaddafi had offered truce talks and a possible peaceful abdication to the United States, which Washington turned down.
“[The article] also makes it clear that the Benghazi investigation needs to be broadened to answer the question: ‘Why did America bomb Libya in the first place?’” commented Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic (Ret.), a key source for the CCB’s interim report who was also quoted by the Times.
“Despite the willingness of both AFRICOM Commander Gen. Carter Ham and Muammar Qaddafi to pursue the possibility of truce talks, permission was not given to Gen. Ham from his chain of command in the Pentagon and the window of opportunity closed,” reads Kubic’s statement for our report from last year. You can watch here, from a CCB press conference last April, as Admiral Kubic described his personal involvement in the effort to open negotiations between Qaddafi and the U.S. government.
Now we learn that the likely source of the stonewalling came from the State Department—and Secretary Clinton—herself. “On the day the U.N. resolution was passed, Mrs. Clinton ordered a general within the Pentagon to refuse to take a call with Gadhafi’s son Seif and other high-level members within the regime, to help negotiate a resolution, the secret recordings reveal,” reported the Times on January 29.
Former Defense Secretary Bob Gates indicated in his book, Duty, that he was opposed to the war for national security reasons. He highlighted a division among White House advisors—with Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, and Samantha Power “urging aggressive U.S. action to prevent an anticipated massacre of the rebels as Qaddafi fought to remain in power.” Add to that list the former Secretary of State.
“But that night, with Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s forces turning back the rebellion that threatened his rule, Mrs. Clinton changed course, forming an unlikely alliance with a handful of top administration aides who had been arguing for intervention,” reported The New York Times on March 18, 2011, the day after UN Resolution 1973 authorizing a “no fly” zone in Libya was voted on and passed.
“Within hours, Mrs. Clinton and the aides had convinced Mr. Obama that the United States had to act, and the president ordered up military plans, which Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, hand-delivered to the White House the next day.”
The Washington Times now reports that “In the recovered recordings, a U.S. intelligence liaison working for the Pentagon told a Gadhafi aide that Mr. Obama privately informed members of Congress that Libya ‘is all Secretary Clinton’s matter’ and that the nation’s highest-ranking generals were concerned that the president was being misinformed” about a humanitarian crisis that didn’t exist. However, one must wonder just how much President Obama implicitly supported Clinton in her blind push to intervene in what was once a comparatively stable country, and an ally in the war against al Qaeda. While this new report is certainly damning of Mrs. Clinton’s actions, and appears to place the blame for the unnecessary chaos in Libya—which ultimately led to Benghazi—on her shoulders, President Obama shares the blame as the ultimate Decider-in-Chief.
“Furthermore, defense officials had direct information from their intelligence asset in contact with the regime that Gadhafi gave specific orders not to attack civilians and to narrowly focus the war on the armed rebels, according to the asset, who survived the war,” reports The Washington Times in its second of three articles. Saving those in Benghazi from a looming massacre by Qaddafi seems to have been a convenient excuse made by the administration for political expediency. Could it be, instead, that President Obama, as well as Mrs. Clinton, put greater value on the rise to power of an “Arab Spring” government with Muslim Brotherhood connections? And, as the CCB interim report shows, the U.S. government was willing to go so far as to facilitate the provision of arms to al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Libya in order to ensure that Qaddafi fell.
Will the mainstream media pick up on these new revelations, or will they cast them aside as another “phony scandal” to throw into their dustbins filled with other stories that might possibly embarrass the Obama administration, or prove to be an impediment to Mrs. Clinton’s path to the White House?
“It’s critical to note that Qaddafi was actively engaged with Department of Defense officials to arrange discussions about his possible abdication and exile when that promising development was squashed by the Obama White House,” noted CCB Member Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer, regarding the failed truce talks. “The Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi has been asking, ‘Why?’ for well over a year now.”
“It is time the American people and the families of those who fought and gave their lives at Benghazi in September 2012 were told why those brave Americans had to die at all, much less die alone with no effort made to save them,” she said.
Clinton, through House Democrats, has indicated that she is willing to testify before the House Select Committee on Benghazi. But Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) recently indicated that the Committee must first examine her emails from the State Department before questioning his witness. This complicates the issue of her testifying, since Mrs. Clinton is in the process of calculating when she will announce her presidential run.
Do the emails that Gowdy has requested from the State Department even extend back to 2011?
Chairman Gowdy identified three “tranches” that his potential questioning would fall under in an interview with Fox’s Greta Van Susteren:
- Why was the U.S. Special Mission Compound open in the first place?
- What actions did Clinton take during the attacks?
- What was Clinton’s role during the talking points and Susan Rice’s Sunday morning talk show visits?
A fourth tranche should be: Clinton’s push to intervene in Libya and how it set the stage for an insecure country and strong jihadist movement willing—and able—to attack the Americans posted there. And while he’s at it, Rep. Gowdy should ask Mrs. Clinton to explain why all of the very legitimate requests for increased security in Benghazi were turned down, and why were Ambassador Chris Stevens’ personal security staff, from the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) directed to store their weapons in a separate location—not on them—on the night of September 11, 2012?
Roger Aronoff is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Following the deaths of David and his family and in a shocking new twist to the recent news about the murder of David Crowly, writer/ director of the documentary known as Gray State: The Rise, a documentary that exposes the NWO Global Police State has just been released in it’s raw uncut version.
Please download this movie to your computer as soon as possible, because it might not be available for much longer due to censorship.
The lands of all the world have always been the reality beneath all the wealth which has given rise to the imbalance of Ninety-Nine to One.
The supposed ‘wealth-creators’ are producing global-poverty instead of prosperity by attacking the planet. As global-predators they’ve decided to kill the 99% that are the renters and the debtors who pay for their own slavery…
The New World Order Revealed
The Vatican has claimed global-ownership of all the land, this defines the “How & Why” of the New Global Feudalism. And this is what has driven Agenda 21, brought to us by the UN and NATO, who are actively engaged as global-military-enforcers. In Ukraine: “The Russian president says Kiev’s troops are essentially a foreign NATO legion, which doesn’t act in Ukraine’s national interests”, thus officially labeling the UN & NATO as outlaw-aggressors in the illegal war against the people of Ukraine.
The greater the concentration of the wealth by the 1%, the more taxes are paid by the 99%. The debtors and the renters BTW get none of the benefits which these draconian taxes pay for: While the filthy-rich profit from every bail-out of the banks, which cover their debts and bury the accounts of those which the supposed ‘bailouts’ were hypothetically created to benefit Yet the DEBTS are kept on the books and the middle class is forced to pay for them again!
The untouchable one percent does not really earn their “income” they profit mostly from the Capital Gains. The rich buy the politicians and control the governments in order to qualify as being “Too Big to Jail”. They bought control of the courts and the just-us systems which they’ve been allowed to do: While as “insiders” they’ve also been allowed to profit directly from insider-trading, while for the rest of us that practice is totally illegal. By buying up the government the 1% has been able to buy the public domain, which the public created and paid for decades ago.
The one-percent is fond of claiming to be anti-big-government. But when it comes to all those non-existent taxes most of them not only do NOT pay, but many of those corporations actually get rebates for all the trouble they went to, to steal everything.
This continuing practice has turned most of us back into serfs in the New Feudalism which makes the Dickensian World of England look like the global-kindergarten of world poverty that we’ve become.
The world of today is not one of “inequality”. It has instead descended-directly into the nightmare of global-slavery. The 99% are now paying three times for their own enslavement. They pay first in the illegal taxes leveled against them and again when the money goes to the same banks that created the illegal-debts which their savings are being stolen to pay for in the guise of a bail-out. That’s the second-time: The third time happens because the public’s “debt” is not removed from the books. This chain of events was just broken today by Greece who voted to break free from this living hell by ‘ending austerity’, to create a new way to sustain themselves against the highway-robbery that has been masquerading as ‘one-world-government’ for the last five years. Socialism for the Rich and Global Vulture Capitalism for the poor in every country that’s the mantra! Google “Corporate Welfare” if you don’t believe me.
“When Politicians and the Media work side-by-side: The jokes they create, at our expense, are all on us” RT
This ‘New Feudalism’ is the only ‘reality’ today…
There’s an additional irony in all of this. If people could still read or be able to write there would be a huge market for a new board-game.
Back during the Market Crash of 1929, the Game of Monopoly was created to explain the evils behind ‘the banks’ to the public. A few years passed and then the hugely popular board-game was purchased by Parker-Brothers where it was converted to escape the original reason for its creation. The ‘new’ Monopoly venerated capitalism and actually taught the public how to “acquire properties”, amass wealth and “Get Out of Jail Free”. The Robber Barons in exile loved it!
In fact in many of the current day yuppiedom coffee shops they delight in using names that worship those bygone days. On Polk Street in the city, one of those shops is called “The Robber Baron”, and another within the same block I live on, is called “Contraband” just to give you a taste of what’s going on.
While the artificial names point to a much different time; there are no conversations going on inside those shops. The “coffee” is more expensive than the booze their exclusivity eliminated but the places themselves are as dead as the inside of eighteenth century cemeteries. Talking is frowned on and the only sounds heard are the clicking of computer keyboards.
At the bank: Some tellers tell me they cannot read my checks because I “write” the names of the people the checks are made out to. Cursive writing is becoming obsolete, just like that typewriter above. Consequently the ‘revised form of Monopoly’, that I would dearly love to create, would not be able to make it now: Because it would be in direct competition with all the murder, rape and torture which has stolen the “games divisions” that once involved games that were based on thought and interaction with other people.
Even the number of those who “REMEMBER” what it was like to live in this country when there was no censorship and still a bit of freedom in most places are dying out. Everyone dies! But when this place allowed the new Robber-Barons to steal all our freedoms, there was a death-sentence passed: Not just against creatures of my age, but against the entire world that can no longer remember what real life and real freedom were all about…
‘Hillary Clinton is a comedic genius. Just listen to her “impersonate” Vladimir Putin. Do you hear that husky, not-at-all-Russian voice? It’s like she NSA wire-tapped into Putin’s voice box and then temporarily share-wared his most inner thoughts. Amazing.
When she loses the 2016 elections, she will surely have gainful employment as a children’s entertainer. She’ll need that job, too, after her husband is through with the legal bills associated with his most recent flying sex slave scandal. The Clintons—America’s living treasures.
And while Clinton is an outspoken, self-righteous Putin hater, she does love an occasional $500K in jewels from Saudi Arabia’s newly-dead, head-chopping monster.’
‘Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is considering a run for the GOP nomination for the presidency. This effort includes releasing a new book, giving speeches in Iowa, and taking the lead of a political action committee, Huck PAC.
Mother Jones has the scoop today on where the money from Huck PAC is actually going. Tim Murphy reports that Huck PAC gave $165,042 to his niece Katherine Harris between 2008 and 2013 for being first a staffer and then a contracted worker. His daughter Sarah Huckabee received $104,308 as the PAC’s executive director. And his daughter-in-law Lauren Huckabee netted $111,273 (his former non-profit America Takes Action, Inc. also gave her $60,548).’